Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process

AMR adopts a double-blind peer review process, ensuring that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other. This approach safeguards objectivity, eliminates bias, and enhances the credibility of the review process. The peer review process follows a structured and systematic approach designed to maintain the highest standards of academic rigor.

Upon submission, all manuscripts undergo an initial screening by the editorial team to determine their alignment with the journal’s aims and scope. Manuscripts that pass this preliminary assessment are assigned to at least two independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant field. Reviewers assess the manuscript based on originality, methodological soundness, theoretical contribution, clarity of presentation, and practical implications. The review process is constructive, with reviewers providing detailed feedback to authors, ensuring continuous scholarly improvement.

Based on reviewers’ recommendations, the editorial team may decide to: (a) accept the manuscript with minor or major revisions, (b) request substantial revisions and resubmission, or (c) reject the manuscript. Authors are required to address all reviewer comments diligently before final acceptance. The average duration of the review process ranges from two to four weeks, depending on the complexity of the submission and the responsiveness of reviewers and authors.